Farmers say NI pollution proposals out of touch
Farmers in Northern Ireland (NI) have strongly criticized the government’s proposed new pollution control measures, calling them “out of touch with reality” and “unworkable for agriculture.”
Key Highlights of the Proposals
These proposals are part of the 2026–2029 Nutrients Action Programme (NAP), aimed at reducing water pollution caused by agriculture. Some major points include:
-
Mandatory Use of Low Emission Slurry Spreading Equipment (LESSE):
All farmers would be required to use specialized slurry spreading equipment to reduce ammonia and nitrogen emissions. -
Stricter Restrictions on Phosphorus Fertilizers:
Plans to restrict or potentially ban the use of phosphorus-based fertilizers. -
Focus on Lough Neagh Clean-Up:
A major goal is to improve the water quality of Lough Neagh, where 62% of the nutrient load comes from agriculture. -
Tougher Enforcement Measures:
Proposals include heavy fines and even potential livestock reductions if rules are broken.
Farmers’ Reaction
The Ulster Farmers’ Union (UFU) President, William Irwin, described the proposals as “deeply concerning.” He argued they focus too heavily on enforcement rather than on education, incentives, or farmer collaboration.
UFU stated that around 3,500 farms would be affected by the phosphorus rules, potentially forcing them to either acquire more land or reduce livestock — which they call a “backdoor attempt to cut livestock numbers.”
Political Reaction
Diana Armstrong, MLA from the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), labeled the proposals as “draconian.” She said many farmers in hilly areas would be unable to comply and urged for broader consultation and a more supportive government approach.
Need for Balance
Experts stress the need for balance between environmental protection and farmers’ livelihoods. The Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) is being urged to provide education, incentives, and workable alternatives instead of just penalties.
Conclusion
Farmers believe that the proposed NAP rules are disconnected from practical agricultural realities and would bring heavy financial and operational burdens. They are calling for a collaborative, balanced approach that protects both the environment and their livelihoods.